Artificial Conversation

Share this post

Stable Diffusion draws controversy on Twitter from artists who say the AI infringes on copyrights

www.artificialconversation.com

Stable Diffusion draws controversy on Twitter from artists who say the AI infringes on copyrights

Stability.ai's beta release of its text-to-image software has less filtering than DALL-E 2, and raises new questions about how it mimics other artists

Evan Drake
Aug 14, 2022
1
Share this post

Stable Diffusion draws controversy on Twitter from artists who say the AI infringes on copyrights

www.artificialconversation.com
A collection of modern or currently working artists from https://proximacentaurib.notion.site/e2537cbf42c34b7e9a9a4126f81dfd0d?v=7b4a3c03fb654045be324eb71acc57e6

Artists are embroiled in a heated debate on Twitter today about whether a new text-to-image AI called Stable Diffusion infringes on the rights of artists.

Twitter avatar for @arvalis
RJ Palmer @arvalis
A new AI image generator appears to be capable of making art that looks 100% human made. As an artist I am extremely concerned.
Image
Image
Image
Image
1:16 AM ∙ Aug 14, 2022
63,633Likes8,181Retweets

Stable Diffusion was released into beta this past week by startup called stability.ai. Unlike DALL-E 2, it doesn’t filter public figures, and it is trained on a dataset called LAION Aesthetics, which contains 120M aesthetic samples of image-text pairs that contain aesthetically pleasing images. A sample of those images is available here, and the Github repo is available here.

“What makes this AI different is that it’s explicitly trained on current working artists… This thing wants our jobs, its [sic] actively anti-artist,” said RJ Palmer, a concept artist who draws creatures.

Other artists weighed in on the debate, saying that the new AI is “morally abhorrent” and could even be considered theft:

Twitter avatar for @frostiefey
Unsidhe | Vartist & Rigger| @ Othercon! @frostiefey
@arvalis I would consider this art theft. It's trained on the work of real artists. Real artists who are neither paid or credited. These artists should sue.
1:34 AM ∙ Aug 14, 2022
2,762Likes115Retweets

Joaquin Baldwin, a director at Disney, noted that since Stable Diffusion is going to be fully open-sourced, its advancement will be hard to prevent.

Twitter avatar for @joabaldwin
Joaquin Baldwin @joabaldwin
@arvalis SD is also going to be fully open, so no matter what, someone somewhere will have their own local copy with whatever dataset they want. Even if an artist asks not to be included in X site, there could be hundreds more popping up using their images in their training datasets.
2:20 AM ∙ Aug 14, 2022
476Likes16Retweets

No doubt, the technology also raises new questions about art education:

Twitter avatar for @KikiDoodleTweet
Kikidoodle & Purrmaids & Too Many Cats?!? @KikiDoodleTweet
@arvalis Things that are about to get really interesting (in a bad way): Reviewing portfolios to hire artists Professors grading assignments Any portfolio based review team
2:50 AM ∙ Aug 14, 2022
2,707Likes66Retweets

As of Sunday afternoon PST, the tweet thread from @arvalis had more than 8K retweets and 64K likes on Twitter.

Thanks for reading Artificial Conversation! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

Share this post

Stable Diffusion draws controversy on Twitter from artists who say the AI infringes on copyrights

www.artificialconversation.com
Comments
TopNew

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2023 Artificial Conversation
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great writing